What’s going on at UofL?

As parents of alumni at the University of Louisville, we tend to be interested in developments at the school. This is the latest:

The University of Louisville will pay its new President Gerry Bradley $850,000 annually, according to a copy of his employment contract obtained by The Courier Journal.

Bradley agreed to a three-year term, with a review for possible extension after two years, according to the contract. He’ll also be entitled to an additional $200,000 in deferred compensation for each academic year he serves as president.

In a sudden turn of events for the university’s leadership, the UofL Board of Trustees appointed Bradley March 26 — the same day former President Kim Schatzel resigned.

Board members have offered few details about what prompted the change in leadership, only saying that Schatzel’s goals and the board’s goals were no longer in alignment.

What does that mean? Does the alignment involve bowing down to the racism of the illegal-alien South African apartheid-reared hair-plugged Space Nazi and his senile, incontinent Orange Chia Pet? Other major universities have already shown that their professed commitment to higher education and the independence of academic institutions was all just bullshit posturing.

Harvard University has become the latest target in the Trump administration’s approach to fight campus antisemitism, with the announcement of a new “comprehensive review” that could jeopardize billions of dollars for the Ivy League college.

A federal antisemitism task force is reviewing more than $255 million in contracts between Harvard and the federal government to make sure the school is following civil rights laws, the administration announced Monday. The government also will examine $8.7 billion in grant commitments to Harvard and its affiliates.

The same task force cut $400 million from Columbia University and threatened to slash billions more if it refused a list of demands from President Donald Trump’s administration. Columbia agreed to many of the changes this month, drawing praise from some Jewish groups and condemnation from free speech groups, who see it as a stunning intrusion by the federal government.

If you’re dealing with the neo-fascists now in power, you should realize that the “antisemitism task force” is just a way to sway a mainstream media that doesn’t want to stand for anything to accepting their propaganda to justify their raping of everyone’s rights regardless of race, religion or gender.

And when they have had their way with other minority groups, do Jewish people really believe they won’t be the next targets? Even the Times of Israel has documented Chia Pet’s antisemitism. And this was back in 2016.

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is facing growing accusations that his campaign is countenancing anti-Semitism – if not encouraging it outright.

Trump’s foreign policy slogan, “America First,” echoes the World War II-era non-interventionist movement championed by a notorious anti-Semite. During the height of the primary campaign, Trump delayed disavowing the support of white supremacist David Duke. And the candidate has failed to condemn the recent anti-Semitic vitriol directed by supporters against journalists who have written critically of Trump, including New York Times reporter Jonathan Weisman and GQ writer Julia Ioffe.

And this was in The Atlantic just last week:

The Trump administration wants you to know that it’s just looking out for Jews. In recent weeks, the White House has cited anti-Semitism as the motivation for many of its controversial moves, whether deporting foreign students who allegedly engaged in pro-Hamas activism or threatening to pull millions of government dollars from Ivy League schools. “SHALOM COLUMBIA,” quipped the White House’s X account, after it canceled federal funding to the university over its “failure to protect Jewish students from antisemitic harassment.”

But this branding is profoundly misleading. In reality, Donald Trump and his allies have been using “anti-Semitism” as a pretext to advance a radical agenda that has nothing to do with Jews at all—and that most American Jews do not support.

Besides, have we really already forgotten this?

So, keep an eye on what UofL is about to do and whether it is going to bow to this guy and the pet he has on his leash.

Leave a comment